Innovative Legal Approaches to Climate Risk Management in Insurance Policies

Main Article Content

Dr. Tebogo Dlamini
Dr. Ramgolam
Dr. Kidist Tesfaye

Abstract

Background: The escalating impact of climate change presents significant challenges for the insurance industry, particularly in regions vulnerable to extreme weather events. Developing innovative legal approaches to climate risk management is essential to ensure sustainable insurance practices that protect both providers and policyholders.


Objective: This study explores the role of legal frameworks in fostering innovative insurance policies tailored to address climate risks. It focuses on identifying best practices and proposing reforms to enhance resilience and sustainability in the face of climate-related challenges.


Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative case study approach, examining climate risk management practices in Botswana, Mauritius, and Ethiopia. Data was collected from legal documents, policy reports, and interviews with insurance regulators, industry experts, and community stakeholders. Comparative analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of legal approaches in integrating climate risk considerations into insurance policies.


Findings: The findings highlight significant progress in Mauritius, where parametric insurance and climate risk pooling have been integrated into national frameworks. In contrast, Botswana and Ethiopia face challenges in aligning legal and insurance practices with emerging climate risks. Key barriers include insufficient data on climate vulnerabilities, low insurance penetration, and regulatory gaps. The study recommends strengthening legal mandates for climate risk disclosure, encouraging public-private partnerships, and leveraging technology for climate risk modeling.

Article Details

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Dr. Tebogo Dlamini, Dr. Ramgolam, & Dr. Kidist Tesfaye. (2024). Innovative Legal Approaches to Climate Risk Management in Insurance Policies. International Insurance Law Review, 32(2), 82-101. https://lumarpub.com/iilr/article/view/32.2.5

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.